<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geography</title>
	<link>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/</link>
	<description>rock out to the apparatus</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>I usually spell no one as two words.  I don't know if one version is more correct than the other, but two words seems to alleviate confusion (i.e. eliminate the tendency to read it as rhyming with boone).
I don't really have any differing connotations between no one and nobody, and between anyone and anybody.  I think the difference is primarily aural.  I would choose one over the other depending on which flowed better with the context.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually spell no one as two words.  I don&#8217;t know if one version is more correct than the other, but two words seems to alleviate confusion (i.e. eliminate the tendency to read it as rhyming with boone).<br />
I don&#8217;t really have any differing connotations between no one and nobody, and between anyone and anybody.  I think the difference is primarily aural.  I would choose one over the other depending on which flowed better with the context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francis s.</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>francis s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Yeah, well, mostly they are interchangeable. But not completely. "Anyone could do it" means pretyt much the opposite of "No one could do it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well, mostly they are interchangeable. But not completely. &#8220;Anyone could do it&#8221; means pretyt much the opposite of &#8220;No one could do it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greengabbro.net/2002/07/23/geography/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;do you ever notice a difference between anyone and anybody, or noone and nobody?&lt;/i&gt;
Nope. Except that "noone" always has, and always will, look funny to me. Looks like it rhymes with "Boone."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>do you ever notice a difference between anyone and anybody, or noone and nobody?</i><br />
Nope. Except that &#8220;noone&#8221; always has, and always will, look funny to me. Looks like it rhymes with &#8220;Boone.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
