<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peer Review the Asbestos Way</title>
	<link>http://greengabbro.net/2003/12/08/peer-review-the-asbestos-way/</link>
	<description>rock out to the apparatus</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peer Review II</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2003/12/08/peer-review-the-asbestos-way/#comment-23015</link>
		<dc:creator>Peer Review II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://greengabbro.net/2003/12/08/peer-review-the-asbestos-way/#comment-23015</guid>
		<description>[...] thinkin&#8217; about this problem of government peer review (though the monsterpost hasn&#8217;t been pushed beyond Tuesday&#8217;s edition, alas) and my intuition just flipflopped. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thinkin&#8217; about this problem of government peer review (though the monsterpost hasn&#8217;t been pushed beyond Tuesday&#8217;s edition, alas) and my intuition just flipflopped. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
