<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moral Matrix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/</link>
	<description>rock out to the apparatus</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>If you think about it, you do agree on 50% of things. Maybe they aren&#8217;t the things that make you choose your leaders, but think carefully about what 0% means&#8230; what 100% means.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about it, you do agree on 50% of things. Maybe they aren&#8217;t the things that make you choose your leaders, but think carefully about what 0% means&#8230; what 100% means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rana</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>Yes on the W!  I mean, geez, the dude&#8217;s in a quadrant completely opposed to the one I&#8217;m in &#8212; so how does that equate to 50% agreement, exactly?  We&#8217;re both humans?
(Um&#8230; Well, _I&#8217;m_ human, last time I looked&#8230;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes on the W!  I mean, geez, the dude&#8217;s in a quadrant completely opposed to the one I&#8217;m in &#8212; so how does that equate to 50% agreement, exactly?  We&#8217;re both humans?<br />
(Um&#8230; Well, _I&#8217;m_ human, last time I looked&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yami</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>yami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Yeah, their politician-matching is a little off - I got a nearly 50% match with W ferchrissakes. Plus their whole system is just pulled out of their ass, but that&#8217;s a feature, not a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, their politician-matching is a little off - I got a nearly 50% match with W ferchrissakes. Plus their whole system is just pulled out of their ass, but that&#8217;s a feature, not a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LDH</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>LDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2005/02/21/the-moral-matrix/#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>I gotta wonder about this quiz just a little &#8212; I came out in the middle of the lower left quadrant: a perfect liberal Democrat (matching up with LBJ and John Freakin&#8217; Kerry, fer Pete&#8217;s sake&#8230;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta wonder about this quiz just a little &#8212; I came out in the middle of the lower left quadrant: a perfect liberal Democrat (matching up with LBJ and John Freakin&#8217; Kerry, fer Pete&#8217;s sake&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
