Secondly, the relevance of the dates is impossible to judge without reading not only the referenced papers, but also all other studies of the same events, since there is no other way to rule out chronological cherry picking. I once read a G3 paper where the authors, in order to get data for their supercontinental-geocycle-800-million-year-timescale-bullshit-hypothesis, picked a reference that misdated the sedimentary basin where I did my thesis by 1 billion years. So there is no way to evaluate their numbers.

Thirdly, when glaciated volcanoes do have significant eruptions, those eruptions invariably melt the glaciers on a timescale faster than that of climate change. So if you REALLY want to save the people of Seattle, shrink the Ranier glacier via global warming as fast as you can, so that there is less ice mass to melt when it does finally blow.

Finally, if you want to melt those glaciers pre-eruption without global warming, perhaps a household cold-fusion generator will provide the thermal power you need.