<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Read Wifework So You Don&#8217;t Have To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/</link>
	<description>rock out to the apparatus</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sabine</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>sabine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>Well thanks for summing it, because now I know I don't want to read it. "Bullyshitty" is something I tend to avoid in my reading subject matter. Although I'm sure that it creeps into my writing sometimes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thanks for summing it, because now I know I don&#8217;t want to read it. &#8220;Bullyshitty&#8221; is something I tend to avoid in my reading subject matter. Although I&#8217;m sure that it creeps into my writing sometimes. <img src='http://greengabbro.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yami</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>yami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>Well, for human history you do some ethnography, take a peek at the written record, and extrapolate. Hell if I know how you say anything definitive about mating strategies over the full course of hominid evolution, though - perhaps you should ask Maushart, she seemed pretty confident in her assertion that monogamy was the one to watch for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for human history you do some ethnography, take a peek at the written record, and extrapolate. Hell if I know how you say anything definitive about mating strategies over the full course of hominid evolution, though - perhaps you should ask Maushart, she seemed pretty confident in her assertion that monogamy was the one to watch for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>How do you determine the prevalance of various mating strategies over the course of human evolution?  Your fossils must be WAY more interestig to look at than the stuff we learned homonid evolution from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you determine the prevalance of various mating strategies over the course of human evolution?  Your fossils must be WAY more interestig to look at than the stuff we learned homonid evolution from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yami</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>yami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Mostly I decided that her examination of the issue was shallow and bullshit - she places the assertions on the page several times, but doesn't actually make the argument. Her insistence on discussing things only in the context of the evolution of monogamy, when polygamy is so damn prevalent over human history, smelled pretty bullshitty to me too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly I decided that her examination of the issue was shallow and bullshit - she places the assertions on the page several times, but doesn&#8217;t actually make the argument. Her insistence on discussing things only in the context of the evolution of monogamy, when polygamy is so damn prevalent over human history, smelled pretty bullshitty to me too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Shellie</title>
		<link>http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Shellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengabbro.net/2006/07/19/i-read-wifework-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-2777</guid>
		<description>uh, so were you convinced that women did in fact evolve to be nurturers who seek mates who are good providers, or did you decide it was bullshit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh, so were you convinced that women did in fact evolve to be nurturers who seek mates who are good providers, or did you decide it was bullshit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
